MYE Scorecard - Policy Maker Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form. - Step 1 of 5LayoutDate *Country *ZambiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouthern AfricaWest AfricaScoring Assessment *BaselineEndlineNext Youth arrive to meetings with decision makers before the appointed time *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Youth provide follow-up to commitments made at meetings with decision-makers within fourteen business days *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Youth arrive to meetings and events with decision-makers dressed in professional/appropriate attire *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Next Youth educated themselves about policymaking and budgeting processes, understanding the timings and decision makers at each step *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Youth engage with peers and/or observe policy-making events (live, online, on television) to better understand the norms of engagement in policy-making meetings and processes *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *PreviousNext Youth have come to consensus on an evidence-driven policy goal and objectives, as well as what actions target decision-makers need to take to achieve them *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Youth have developed communications strategies with documentation, data, and trained messengers who can answer questions that may arise in support of the goals and objectives. *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *PreviousNext Youth have established mechanisms to efficiently communicate with and solicit feedback from a diverse and representative group of youth on the policy goals and objectives. *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Youth have identified (or trained, if necessary) representatives that are wellversed in the full range of perspectives among youth constituencies *Scoring12345Score 1: Very poor, Score 2: Poor, Score 3: Average, Score 4: Good, Score 5: ExcellentJustification *Updating preview…This is a preview of your submission. It has not been submitted yet! Please take a moment to verify your information. You can also go back to make changes.PreviousSubmit