Youth Scorecard
Y-ACT
Meaningful Youth Engagement Scorecard
Tobacco Control — MYE Assessment Tool
Session Info
Committee
Inclusive
Representative
Skilled
Supportive
Transparent
Submit
Done
Session Information
Enter the basic details for this scoring session.
Committee Members
Register the 5 youth advocates and 5 policy makers on this committee.
| Full Name | Organisation | Role | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Youth Score Policy Makers
Youth assess how inclusive, representative, skilled, supportive and transparent decision-makers are.
Inclusive
Youth are represented in policymaking bodies and engaged in policymaking processes.Communications on opportunities for public engagement in policymaking processes (e.g., national hearings) are relayed through television, radio, and social media channels at least fourteen business days in advance.
Score:
Youth are invited to engage at every step of the policymaking process, including the identification, development, implementation, and evaluation of Tobacco control-related policies, budgets and programming.
Score:
At least one young person between the ages of 18–35 is an official member of tobacco control policy advisory committees and bodies.
Score:
Youth representatives have decision-making authority and are engaged in agenda-and priority-setting, as well as membership decisions.
Score:
Resources needed by youth are provided.
Score:
Representative
Youth are able and willing to represent the perspectives of the broader youth community in their region, including marginalized and vulnerable populations.Decision-makers provide educational opportunities for youth to learn about policy-making processes and norms.
Score:
Youth invited as representatives are part of a network that allows them to solicit and share perspectives of a diverse set of stakeholders (e.g., socio-economic status, gender, age, geography, education, inclusive of marginalized and vulnerable populations).
Score:
At least fourteen business days' notice is given for representatives to solicit stakeholder perspectives on agenda items before attending meetings and forums.
Score:
Skilled
Decision-makers understand the challenges to meaningful youth engagement and practice methods to overcome them.Decision-makers have attended a youth-sensitization training or forum.
Score:
Decision-makers can accurately identify the challenges and solutions to meaningful youth engagement outlined in this document.
Score:
Supportive
Decision-makers value the engagement of youth in decision-making processes.Decision-makers have championed an initiative or created a new role that encourages active engagement of youth.
Score:
Decision-makers have participated in a youth-led initiative.
Score:
Decision-makers can accurately identify the challenges and solutions to meaningful youth engagement outlined in this document.
Score:
Transparent
Decision-makers effectively communicate their progress and actions taken on youth priorities.Decision-makers communicate their progress and actions at each stage of the policy-making process (e.g., identification, development, implementation, and evaluation) through social media channels used by youth.
Score:
Communications of progress and actions are made within 14 business days of the decision or action.
Score:
Decision-makers communicate using simple, common language.
Score:
Review & Submit
All sections complete. Click submit to save this scorecard.
By submitting this scorecard you confirm that all scores reflect the genuine consensus of the MYE committee for this session.
Scorecard Submitted!
Your MYE scorecard has been saved successfully.
— / 5
Average score across all indicators